Project management plays a crucial role in the development of medicines, particularly during Phase 4, also known as the post-marketing surveillance phase. This phase focuses on monitoring the safety and effectiveness of medications in real-world populations. Effective project management ensures the smooth coordination of activities, adherence to timelines, and successful achievement of objectives. Choosing the right project management methodology is paramount to streamline the processes and optimise outcomes. In this article, I would like to explore the importance of project management in Phase 4 of medicines development and determine the most suitable project management methodology, along with potential adaptations.
Phase 4 studies are vital for identifying and managing potential risks associated with medications as well as assessing the effectiveness and drug utilisation amongst others, after they have been approved and released to the market. Let’s explore how project management plays a vital role in each phase of the RWE studies:
Protocol Writing:
Project management ensures effective coordination and collaboration among multiple partners during the protocol writing phase. Key activities include defining research objectives, study design, data collection methods, and ethical considerations. A project manager facilitates communication, sets clear timelines and deliverables, and ensures that all partners are aligned with the study protocol.
Data Collection:
In multi-country RWE studies, project management becomes essential for coordinating data collection activities across different regions and partners. The project manager oversees the development and implementation of standardised data collection processes, including data collection tools, training materials, and data management systems. They ensure that data collection timelines are adhered to and monitor data quality and completeness.
Analysis:
The analysis phase requires project management to coordinate data analysis activities across different partners. The project manager ensures that analysis plans and statistical methods are consistently applied across all study sites. They collaborate with statisticians and data analysts to ensure that the analysis is conducted accurately and efficiently. Regular progress updates and data sharing are facilitated by the project manager to maintain transparency and consistency throughout the analysis phase.
Report Writing:
In large-scale multi-country studies, project management is crucial for report writing to ensure consistency, quality, and timely delivery. The project manager coordinates the writing process, assigns responsibilities to different partners, and monitors progress. They facilitate the integration of study findings from different regions, harmonise the writing style and formatting, and ensure compliance with regulatory guidelines. The project manager also oversees the internal review process and manages feedback from partners and stakeholders, ensuring that the final report meets the study objectives and addresses the research questions.
The benefits of Project Management in multi-country RWE Studies includes, but not limited to:
Communication and Coordination: Effective project management enables seamless communication and coordination among partners, ensuring that everyone is aligned with study objectives, timelines, and deliverables. It facilitates collaboration and reduces the likelihood of miscommunication or misunderstandings.
Risk Management: Project management helps identify potential risks and challenges in a multi-country study, such as variations in data collection practices or regulatory requirements. The project manager develops risk mitigation strategies and contingency plans to address these challenges proactively, minimising their impact on the study’s progress.
Resource Allocation: Project management ensures efficient resource allocation across multiple partners and study sites. The project manager optimises the allocation of personnel, budgets, and equipment, maximizing the study’s efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Quality Control: The project manager implements rigorous quality control processes throughout the study, from protocol development to report writing. They establish quality assurance measures, conduct regular data audits, and facilitate quality review of deliverables to maintain the study’s overall quality and integrity.
Timely Delivery: With multiple partners and study sites involved, project management becomes essential for ensuring timely delivery of study milestones and reports. The project manager sets realistic timelines, monitors progress, and addresses any delays promptly to keep the study on track.
While project management methodologies are typically associated with software development and traditional project management, they can still be adapted and applied to RWE studies to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
There are several project management methodologies used in different industries and contexts. In Table 1 there are some popular and most used methodologies in public health and their applicability to the RWE studies:
| Methodology | Key Characteristics | Applicability to Phase 4 Studies |
| Waterfall | Sequential and linear progression | Clear coordination and communication |
| Emphasis on planning and documentation | Compliance and financial management | |
| Limited flexibility | Quality assurance and documentation | |
| Stakeholder involvement during specific phases | ||
| Agile | Iterative and flexible approach | Adaptability to emerging safety concerns |
| Continuous feedback and collaboration | Agile project planning and execution | |
| Emphasis on adaptability and responsiveness | Iterative refinement of protocols and risk management | |
| Close stakeholder involvement throughout the project | ||
| Lean | Streamlining processes and eliminating waste | Efficiency in administrative aspects of the project |
| Continuous improvement and value creation | Optimization of data management processes | |
| Focus on customer value and resource utilization | Continuous improvement of project quality |
Table 1: Comparison of Project Management Methodologies.
Among the methodologies mentioned above, Agile methodologies, particularly Scrum and Kanban, could be well-suited for RWE studies. The project can be divided into smaller iterations or sprints, focusing on specific research objectives, such as studying the safety or effectiveness of a medication. Each sprint can have a defined timeframe and set of deliverables. Agile methodologies allow for flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances or emerging research questions. The research team can prioritise and address the most critical aspects of the study while leaving room for adjustments based on new data or regulatory requirements. Agile promotes collaboration among team members, including epidemiologists, statisticians, data analysts, and clinicians. Regular meetings, such as daily stand-ups or sprint reviews, facilitate communication, problem-solving, and decision-making. Agile methodologies emphasise continuous feedback and learning. Regular data analyses and discussions with stakeholders help refine research questions, methodologies, and analysis plans as new insights emerge.
The choice of methodology also depends on the organisational culture, team dynamics, and other factors. It’s common for organisations to tailor or combine methodologies to suit their specific needs.
References:
Anderson, D. J. (2010). “Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business”.
Cohn, M. (2009). “Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum”.
Jörgensen, T. L., & Emmertsen, M. (2018). Applying Project Management Principles in Clinical Research. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 52(4), 482–489.
Harry, M. J., & Schroeder, R. (2000). “Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations”.
Khan, S. (2019). Waterfall Project Management Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide.
Liker, J. K. (2004). “The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer”.
Luo, J., Zhang, G., & Kim, J. (2019). Project management in health.
Martin, K. (2020). Waterfall Project Management: A Step-by-Step Guide. ProjectManager.com. Retrieved from: https://www.projectmanager.com/waterfall-project-management
McConnell, S. (1996). “Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules”.
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2017). “The Scrum Guide”.
Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. A. (2014). “The Six Sigma Handbook: A Complete Guide for Green Belts, Black Belts, and Managers at All Levels”.
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). “Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation”.